The Authors

Preface

Part I Foundations

1 The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization
Simon Buckingham Shum

1.1 Excavating the Roots to CSAV
1.2 Mapping the History of Argument Visualization
1.3 From Prototypes to Sustained Work Practices?
1.4 Conclusion
1.5 References

2 A Cognitive Framework for Cooperative Problem Solving with Argument Visualization
Jan M. van Bruggen, Henny P.A Boshuizen and Paul A. Kirschner

2.1 Introduction
2.2 Problem Solving, Reasoning and Argumentation
2.3 Cognitive and Communicative Demands of Collaborative       Problem Solving
2.4 Representational and Communicative Features of CSAV       Environments
2.5 Acknowledgement
2.6 References

Part II Applications

3 Designing Argumentation Tools for Collaborative Learning
Gellof Kanselaar, Gijsbert Erkens, Jerry Andriessen, Maaike Prangsma, Arja Veerman and Jos Jaspers

3.1 Introduction
3.2 Argumentation and Collaboration in CMC Systems
3.3 The TC3 Environment
3.4 Results
3.5 Discussion and Conclusion
3.6 Acknowledgements
3.7 References

4 Using Computer Supported Argument Visualization to Teach Legal Argumentation
Chad S. Carr

4.1 Legal Reasoning and the Process of Argumentation
4.2 How do we Support the Development of Argumentation Skills?
4.3 A Study of CSAV in Legal Education
4.4 Conclusion and Future Research
4.5 References

5 Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported Visualization
Tim van Gelder

5.1 Introduction
5.2 What is Argument Visualization?
5.3 Argument Visualization Versus Prose
5.4 New Tools for Argument Visualization
5.5 Enhancing Deliberation via Argument Visualization
5.6 Argument Visualization in Critical Thinking Training
5.7 Conclusion
5.8 References

6 Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study
Jeff Conklin

6.1 Introduction
6.2 IBIS: Issue-Based Information System
6.3 Dialog Mapping
6.4 Case Study: A Decade’s Deployment in a Public Utility
6.5 Introducing Dialog Mapping into a New Organization
6.6 Conclusion and Future Directions
6.7 References

7 Fostering Collective Intelligence: Helping Groups Use Visualized Argumentation
Albert M. Selvin

7.1 Introduction
7.2 Background
7.3 Principles of Facilitation
7.4 Tools and Representations
7.5 Examples in Practice
7.6 Discussion and Conclusions
7.7 Acknowledgements
7.8 References

8 Infrastructure for Navigating Interdisciplinary Debates: Critical Decisions for Representing Argumentation
Robert E. Horn

8.1 Differences Among Types of Debates
8.2 What Level of Detail?
8.3 Case Number One: Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think?
8.4 Case Number Two: Genetically Modified Food
8.5 Case Number Three: Consciousness Research
8.6 Conclusion: Our Vision
8.7 Acknowledgements
8.8 References

9 Visualizing Internetworked Argumentation
Simon Buckingham Shum, Victoria Uren, Gangmin Li, John Domingue, Enrico Motta

9.1 Scholarly Publishing and Argumentation: Beyond Prose
9.2 What’s the Problem?
9.3 The Discourse Ontology
9.4 Making Claims Requires Mental Mapping
9.5 Visual Construction of Argumentative Claims
9.6 Analysis and Visualization of Claims Networks
9.7 Conclusion
9.8 Acknowledgements
9.9 References

Afterword
Douglas C. Engelbart

Index